2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1997 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volvo C70 (236 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ranger. (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Volvo C70 weights approximately 468 kg more than 2009 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Volvo C70 (330 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ranger. (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1997 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | C70 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1022 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 68 L |