2009 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda MPV would be higher. Both 2009 Ford Ranger and 2003 Mazda MPV are equipped with a 2,260 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Mazda MPV. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda MPV weights approximately 674 kg more than 2009 Ford Ranger.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda MPV. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 2003 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | MPV |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |