2009 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Pontiac Montana
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Pontiac Montana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Pontiac Montana would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pontiac Montana (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 754 kg more than 2009 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Pontiac Montana, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Pontiac Montana (285 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2003 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ranger. 2003 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 2003 Pontiac Montana | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Ranger | Montana |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 76 L |