2009 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ranger. (207 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 768 kg more than 2009 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ranger. (323 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ranger | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Ranger | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1022 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 74 L |
