2009 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (141 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 610 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (330 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (230 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Ranger 2004 Mazda 3
Make Ford Mazda
Model Ranger 3
Year Released 2009 2004
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 1595 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 141 HP 104 HP
Torque 330 Nm 230 Nm
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Top Speed 158 km/hour 185 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 17.9 seconds 11.3 seconds
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1850 kg 1240 kg
Vehicle Length 4280 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1830 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2990 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.9 L/100km 5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]