2009 Ford Ranger vs. 2009 SsangYong Stavic

To start off, both 2009 Ford Ranger and 2009 SsangYong Stavic were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2009 SsangYong Stavic. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2009 SsangYong Stavic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Stavic weights approximately 901 kg more than 2009 Ford Ranger.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Stavic (342 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ranger. (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ranger. 2009 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Ranger 2009 SsangYong Stavic
Make Ford SsangYong
Model Ranger Stavic
Year Released 2009 2009
Body Type Pickup Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4015 cc 2696 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 207 HP 163 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 323 Nm 342 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 18.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 3 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1022 kg 1923 kg
Vehicle Length 5180 mm 5130 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1920 mm
Wheelbase Size 3200 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.8 L/100km 9.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 74 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]