2009 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2013 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln Navigator (306 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ranger. (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 1701 kg more than 2009 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ranger. (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ranger. 2013 Lincoln Navigator has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Lincoln Navigator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ranger | 2013 Lincoln Navigator | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Ranger | Navigator |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 306 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1022 kg | 2723 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2332 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1988 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3023 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 106 L |
