2009 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Scion iQ
To start off, 2013 Scion iQ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2013 Scion iQ. (93 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2013 Scion iQ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 6 kg more than 2013 Scion iQ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Scion iQ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Scion iQ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Scion iQ. (121 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Scion iQ.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 2013 Scion iQ | |
Make | Ford | Scion |
Model | Ranger | iQ |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1329 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | single |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2000 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |