2009 Ford S-Max vs. 1993 Rover 800
To start off, 2009 Ford S-Max is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 800 would be higher. At 2,675 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Rover 800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Rover 800 (167 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2009 Ford S-Max. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Rover 800 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford S-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford S-Max weights approximately 219 kg more than 1993 Rover 800.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford S-Max (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 800. (225 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford S-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 800.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford S-Max | 1993 Rover 800 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | S-Max | 800 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2675 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1743 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.4 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |