2009 Ford S-Max vs. 2012 Citroen C4
To start off, 2012 Citroen C4 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford S-Max. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford S-Max would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford S-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford S-Max (128 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C4. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford S-Max weights approximately 406 kg more than 2012 Citroen C4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford S-Max (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C4. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford S-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C4.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford S-Max | 2012 Citroen C4 | |
Make | Ford | Citroen |
Model | S-Max | C4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.9 seconds | 10.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1743 kg | 1337 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.4 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |