2009 Ford Shelby GT 500 vs. 2012 Holden Epica

To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Shelby GT 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Shelby GT 500 would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Shelby GT 500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Shelby GT 500 (500 HP) has 347 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Shelby GT 500 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.

Because 2009 Ford Shelby GT 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Shelby GT 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Shelby GT 500 (651 Nm) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Shelby GT 500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Shelby GT 500 2012 Holden Epica
Make Ford Holden
Model Shelby GT 500 Epica
Year Released 2009 2012
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5409 cc 2492 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 500 HP 153 HP
Torque 651 Nm 237 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4805 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14.7 L/100km 9.3 L/100km