2009 Ford Taurus vs. 1953 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2009 Ford Taurus is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Taurus (263 HP @ 6251 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1953 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 503 kg more than 2009 Ford Taurus.
Because 2009 Ford Taurus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Talbot T 26. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1953 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1953 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Taurus | 1953 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Ford | Talbot |
| Model | Taurus | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6251 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1890 mm |
