2009 Ford Taurus vs. 1963 Isuzu Bellett
To start off, 2009 Ford Taurus is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Taurus (260 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (84 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Taurus weights approximately 46 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Isuzu Bellett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Taurus (249 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (123 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. 2009 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1963 Isuzu Bellett has manual transmission. 1963 Isuzu Bellett will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Taurus | 1963 Isuzu Bellett | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Taurus | Bellett |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 84 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 249 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 40 L |