2009 Ford Taurus vs. 1985 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 2009 Ford Taurus is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Taurus (263 HP @ 6251 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1985 Renault Rodeo. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1985 Renault Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Taurus weights approximately 246 kg more than 1985 Renault Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Taurus (338 Nm @ 4501 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Renault Rodeo. (72 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Renault Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Taurus | 1985 Renault Rodeo | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Taurus | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1106 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6251 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 72 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4501 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 34 L |
