2009 Ford Taurus vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2009 Ford Taurus is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Taurus (263 HP @ 6251 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1218 kg more than 2009 Ford Taurus.
Because 2009 Ford Taurus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 338 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Taurus | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Taurus | Econoline |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6251 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4501 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3510 mm |