2009 Ford Taurus vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, both 2009 Ford Taurus and 2009 Holden Commodore were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Taurus (263 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Because 2009 Ford Taurus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Taurus (338 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore. 2009 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Taurus | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Taurus | Commodore |
Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |