2009 Ford Taurus X vs. 2006 Mazda MPV

To start off, 2009 Ford Taurus X is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Taurus X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Taurus X (263 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2006 Mazda MPV. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus X should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Taurus X weights approximately 297 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Ford Taurus X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Taurus X (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Taurus X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Taurus X 2006 Mazda MPV
Make Ford Mazda
Model Taurus X MPV
Year Released 2009 2006
Body Type Crossover Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3496 cc 2966 cc
Horse Power 263 HP 200 HP
Torque 338 Nm 271 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 6 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1107 kg 810 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1720 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2870 mm 2850 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 10.7 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 15.7 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 75 L