2009 Ford Transit Connect vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2009 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Transit Connect. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Transit Connect has automatic transmission and 1954 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1954 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Transit Connect will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Transit Connect | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Transit Connect | CJ |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
| Body Type | Panel Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 136 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
