2009 Ford Transit Connect vs. 1979 Nissan Laurel
To start off, 2009 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Nissan Laurel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Nissan Laurel would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Nissan Laurel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Nissan Laurel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Transit Connect | 1979 Nissan Laurel | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Transit Connect | Laurel |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |