2009 Ford Transit Connect vs. 1993 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1993 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Transit Connect. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Transit Connect has automatic transmission and 1993 Jeep Cherokee has manual transmission. 1993 Jeep Cherokee will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Transit Connect will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Transit Connect | 1993 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Transit Connect | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
| Body Type | Panel Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 181 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
