2009 Ford Transit Connect vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2009 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Transit Connect | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Ford | Spyker |
Model | Transit Connect | C8 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1890 mm |