2009 Geely CK vs. 1956 Riley RM A
To start off, 2009 Geely CK is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Geely CK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Riley RM A weights approximately 195 kg more than 2009 Geely CK.
Because 1956 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Geely CK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Geely CK has automatic transmission and 1956 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1956 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Geely CK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Geely CK | 1956 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Geely | Riley |
| Model | CK | RM A |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2870 mm |
