2009 Geely CK vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Geely CK is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Geely CK (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Geely CK should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2009 Geely CK.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Geely CK. (128 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Geely CK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Geely CK | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Geely | Triumph |
| Model | CK | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.7 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |
