2009 Geely CK vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Geely CK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Geely CK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2009 Geely CK. (93 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2009 Geely CK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2009 Geely CK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Geely CK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Geely CK. (128 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Geely CK. 2009 Geely CK has automatic transmission and 2005 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2005 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Geely CK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Geely CK | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Geely | Mazda |
Model | CK | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 211 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1065 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 61 L |