2009 GMC Acadia vs. 1981 Lada 2105
To start off, 2009 GMC Acadia is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Acadia (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1981 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 1981 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 GMC Acadia weights approximately 1433 kg more than 1981 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 GMC Acadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 GMC Acadia | 1981 Lada 2105 | |
| Make | GMC | Lada |
| Model | Acadia | 2105 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2435 kg | 1002 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2430 mm |
