2009 GMC Acadia vs. 1981 Lada S
To start off, 2009 GMC Acadia is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lada S would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1981 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 GMC Acadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 GMC Acadia has automatic transmission and 1981 Lada S has manual transmission. 1981 Lada S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 GMC Acadia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 GMC Acadia | 1981 Lada S | |
| Make | GMC | Lada |
| Model | Acadia | S |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 43 L |
