2009 GMC Acadia vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2009 GMC Acadia is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Acadia (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 GMC Acadia weights approximately 1243 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 GMC Acadia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 GMC Acadia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Acadia (366 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2009 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Acadia | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | GMC | Lancia |
Model | Acadia | Nea |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2613 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2590 mm |