2009 GMC Canyon vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2009 GMC Canyon is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Canyon (182 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 GMC Canyon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Canyon (190 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Canyon | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
Make | GMC | Jeep |
Model | Canyon | CJ |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 3151 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2060 mm |