2009 GMC Canyon vs. 1958 Maserati 300

To start off, 2009 GMC Canyon is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Maserati 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Maserati 300 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Maserati 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Maserati 300 (243 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2009 GMC Canyon. (182 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Maserati 300 should accelerate faster than 2009 GMC Canyon.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 GMC Canyon 1958 Maserati 300
Make GMC Maserati
Model Canyon 300
Year Released 2009 1958
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2901 cc 2992 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 182 HP 243 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 7000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Length 4890 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1460 mm
Vehicle Height 1900 mm 990 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2320 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]