2009 GMC Canyon vs. 1974 Triumph Stag
To start off, 2009 GMC Canyon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Canyon (182 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1974 Triumph Stag. (143 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph Stag.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Triumph Stag (235 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 GMC Canyon. (190 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1974 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Canyon | 1974 Triumph Stag | |
Make | GMC | Triumph |
Model | Canyon | Stag |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 63 L |