2009 GMC Canyon vs. 1986 Holden Astra
To start off, 2009 GMC Canyon is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Astra would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Canyon (182 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra.
Because 2009 GMC Canyon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 GMC Canyon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Canyon (190 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (124 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Canyon | 1986 Holden Astra | |
Make | GMC | Holden |
Model | Canyon | Astra |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2420 mm |