2009 GMC Canyon vs. 1994 Volvo 850
To start off, 2009 GMC Canyon is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Canyon (182 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1994 Volvo 850. (124 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1994 Volvo 850.
Because 2009 GMC Canyon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 GMC Canyon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Canyon (190 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Volvo 850. (170 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Volvo 850.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 GMC Canyon | 1994 Volvo 850 | |
| Make | GMC | Volvo |
| Model | Canyon | 850 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2901 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2670 mm |
