2009 GMC Canyon vs. 1995 Mini MK VI
To start off, 2009 GMC Canyon is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Canyon (182 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1995 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1995 Mini MK VI.
Because 2009 GMC Canyon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 GMC Canyon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Canyon (190 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Canyon | 1995 Mini MK VI | |
Make | GMC | Mini |
Model | Canyon | MK VI |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 68 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2040 mm |