2009 GMC Canyon vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2009 GMC Canyon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Canyon (182 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Magna. (141 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 2009 GMC Canyon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 GMC Canyon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna (205 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 GMC Canyon. (190 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Canyon | 1996 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | GMC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Canyon | Magna |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 2351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2730 mm |