2009 GMC Canyon vs. 2004 GMC Safari
To start off, 2009 GMC Canyon is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2009 GMC Canyon. (182 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2009 GMC Canyon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 GMC Canyon. (190 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Canyon | 2004 GMC Safari | |
Make | GMC | GMC |
Model | Canyon | Safari |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 102 L |