2009 GMC Canyon vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2009 GMC Canyon. (182 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2009 GMC Canyon.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 GMC Canyon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 GMC Canyon. (190 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Canyon | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | GMC | Jeep |
Model | Canyon | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1798 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 85 L |