2009 GMC Sierra vs. 1972 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2009 GMC Sierra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Sierra (192 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Sierra (260 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 1300. 2009 GMC Sierra has automatic transmission and 1972 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1972 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 GMC Sierra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Sierra | 1972 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | GMC | Zastava |
Model | Sierra | 1300 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 260 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2430 mm |