2009 GMC Sierra vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2009 GMC Sierra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Sierra (192 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Sierra (260 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Sierra | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Sierra | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2480 mm |