2009 GMC Sierra vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 2009 GMC Sierra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda SW-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda SW-X would be higher.
Because 2009 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 GMC Sierra | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
| Make | GMC | Mazda |
| Model | Sierra | SW-X |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 327 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 55 L |
