2009 GMC Sierra vs. 2000 Honda Capa
To start off, 2009 GMC Sierra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda Capa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda Capa would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Sierra (327 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 2000 Honda Capa. (97 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda Capa.
Because 2009 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Capa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Sierra (367 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda Capa. (136 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda Capa.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Sierra | 2000 Honda Capa | |
Make | GMC | Honda |
Model | Sierra | Capa |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 327 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2370 mm |