2009 GMC Sierra vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 GMC Sierra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher.
Because 2009 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 GMC Sierra | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | GMC | Renault |
| Model | Sierra | Clio |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 192 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 50 L |
