2009 GMC Sierra vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2009 GMC Sierra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 6,199 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Sierra (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1314 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Sierra (565 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2009 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 GMC Sierra | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | GMC | Mazda |
| Model | Sierra | CU-X |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6199 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 403 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 565 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2659 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 80 L |
