2009 GMC Sierra vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 GMC Sierra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1839 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2009 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Sierra (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 473 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 GMC Sierra | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | GMC | Smart |
| Model | Sierra | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 403 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 565 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2659 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.5 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 19.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 33 L |
