2009 GMC Yukon vs. 1962 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2009 GMC Yukon is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Yukon (292 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1962 Sunbeam Alpine. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1962 Sunbeam Alpine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Yukon (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Sunbeam Alpine. (127 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Yukon | 1962 Sunbeam Alpine | |
Make | GMC | Sunbeam |
Model | Yukon | Alpine |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 40 L |