2009 GMC Yukon vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2009 GMC Yukon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Yukon (292 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (168 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 GMC Yukon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Yukon (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (278 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2009 GMC Yukon | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | GMC | Nissan |
Model | Yukon | Hardbody |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 3275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 278 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 84 L |