2009 Holden Commodore vs. 2000 Honda CR-V

To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 92 more horse power than 2000 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda CR-V.

Because 2000 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda CR-V. 2000 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: