2009 Holden Commodore vs. 2010 Ford F-350
To start off, 2010 Ford F-350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-350 (301 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Because 2010 Ford F-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-350 (495 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2010 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Holden Commodore | 2010 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | Commodore | F-350 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2564 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 301 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 495 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |