2009 Holden Commodore vs. 2012 Buick Regal

To start off, 2012 Buick Regal is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Buick Regal. (220 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2012 Buick Regal.

Because 2009 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Buick Regal (352 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2012 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore. 2012 Buick Regal has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Buick Regal will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: