2009 Holden Epica vs. 2000 Holden Astra
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Holden Astra. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2000 Holden Astra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Holden Astra. (165 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Holden Astra. 2000 Holden Astra has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Epica has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Holden Astra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Holden Epica | 2000 Holden Astra | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Epica | Astra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 165 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |