2009 Holden Epica vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Holden Epica | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | Epica | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2490 mm |